Gender Differences in Publication Productivity, Academic Rank, and Career Duration Among U.S. Academic Gastroenterology Faculty.
نویسندگان
چکیده
PURPOSE Female representation in academic medicine is increasing without proportional increases in female representation at senior ranks. The purpose of this study is to describe the gender representation in academic gastroenterology (GI) and compare publication productivity, academic rank, and career duration between male and female gastroenterologists. METHOD In 2014, the authors collected data including number of publications, career duration, h-index, and m-index for faculty members at 114 U.S. academic GI programs. RESULTS Of 2,440 academic faculty, 1,859 (76%) were men and 581 (24%) were women. Half (50%) of men held senior faculty position compared with 29% of women (P < .001). Compared with female faculty, male faculty had significantly (P < .001) longer careers (20 vs. 11 years), more publications (median 24 [0-949] vs. 9 [0-438]), and higher h-indices (8 vs. 4). Higher h-index correlated with higher academic rank (P < .001). The authors detected no difference in the h-index between men and women at the same rank for professor, associate professor, and instructor, nor any difference in the m-index between men and women (0.5 vs. 0.46, respectively, P = .214). CONCLUSIONS A gender gap exists in the number and proportion of women in academic GI; however, after correcting for career duration, productivity measures that consider quantity and impact are similar for male and female faculty. Women holding senior faculty positions are equally productive as their male counterparts. Early and continued career mentorship will likely lead to continued increases in the rise of women in academic rank.
منابع مشابه
Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty.
PURPOSE This study aimed to analyze gender differences in rank, career duration, publication productivity, and research funding among radiation oncologists at U.S. academic institutions. METHOD For 82 domestic academic radiation oncology departments, the authors identified current faculty and recorded their academic rank, degree, and gender. The authors recorded bibliographic metrics for phys...
متن کاملDoes Sex Influence Publication Productivity Among Colorectal Surgeons Participating in Fellowship Training Programs?
BACKGROUND Underrepresentation of highly ranked women in academic surgery is recognized. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to examine whether sex differences exist in faculty representation, academic rank, and publication productivity among colorectal faculty in fellowship programs. DESIGN American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons fellowship program faculty were identified. Bibliometric data ...
متن کاملStresses and workplace resources for academic junior faculty: track and gender comparisons.
Despite the increasing numbers of women at all levels of academic medicine, women remain significantly less likely than are men to achieve senior rank or leadership positions. Possible explanations for the differences include limited access to mentoring, fewer rewards such as promotions, lower salaries, and less appropriate recognition. The slower progress of women faculty has also been related...
متن کاملEvaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health-Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists.
PURPOSE Publication metrics are useful in evaluating academic faculty for awarding grants, recruitment, and promotion. A new metric, the relative citation ratio (RCR), was recently released by the National Institutes of Health (NIH); however, no benchmark data yet exist. We sought to create benchmark data for physician faculty in academic radiation oncology (RO) and analyze correlations associa...
متن کاملRace/Ethnicity and Success in Academic Medicine: Findings From a Longitudinal Multi-Institutional Study.
PURPOSE To understand differences in productivity, advancement, retention, satisfaction, and compensation comparing underrepresented medical (URM) faculty with other faculty at multiple institutions. METHOD A 17-year follow-up was conducted of the National Faculty Survey, a random sample from 24 U.S. medical schools, oversampled for URM faculty. The authors examined academic productivity, adv...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
دوره 91 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016